Playtest Darksome Delve or Survival Horizon RPGs
I’m excited to share some news. Surprise Threat! is looking for playtesters for two new titles: Darksome Delve and Survival Horizon RPG.
Let me elaborate a bit:
Darksome Delve: A Fantasy Dungeon Crawler
First, let's talk about Darksome Delve. It's a fantasy dungeon crawler (but not exactly OSR). Players venture into dark caverns, deep crypts, and sunken castles, face monsters and hazards, and unearth treasure along the way. The game uses a streamlined d6 dice pool system, making it easy to pick up and play. The rulebook is 112 pages but only 26 of those are core mechanics. The rest are setting lore, GM advice, and over 85 monsters (with a guide to create more).
In Darksome Delve, players create characters in minutes using Tags, Knacks, Affinities, and Abilities. No classes, no stats, no skill points, or levels. It's different but it works. Advance by spending treasure. GMs get challenge dice to challenge the players, activate monster abilities, and to build a dungeon as you go.
Survival Horizon RPG: An Alien Invasion Survival Game
Next, I have Survival Horizon RPG. It's a present day world where alien forces have utterly destroyed human civilization. Your group works together amidst the chaos to outsmart, outrun, or outlast the extraterrestrial threats. The game uses a step-dice hit-count system where resources diminish as you use them.. The rulebook is 64 pages (24 core mechanics) and can produce fast-paced gameplay or more measured narrative gameplay.
Survival Horizon is a great fit for fans of sci-fi or distopian survival. Character creation is quick enough to make survivors on the fly, but deep enough to make every game different. The game’s mechanics emphasize collaboration, ensuring that every player’s decisions impact the group’s chances of survival. This game also has options for solo or GM-less play.
Calling All Playtesters!
Now, this is where I need your help! I am looking for additional playtesters willing to gather a group to play one or both of these games. It’s a chance to get a look at what Surprise Threat is developing and to influence the future of these RPGs.
I know. These aren't cyberpunk, and they don't even use Anarchy mechanics, but If you enjoy my contributions to Shadowrun: Anarchy, you will likely enjoy my take on these RPG rulesets.
As a playtester, you'll experience Darksome Delve and Survival Horizon during their end, but not final, stages. I simply ask that you complete a brief questionnaire after your sessions to share your thoughts. Your feedback will help further refine the games!
Everyone involved will receive credit in the game and a free digital copy of the game they tested. It’s an awesome way to contribute while enjoying some mediocre rewards!
Ready?
So, what do you think? Feel like dungeon crawling in Darksome Delve or fighting against alien forces in Survival Horizon?
If you're interested in becoming a playtester or have any questions, please reach out to me at surprisethreat@gmail.com
The subject of exploring learning through shared interests feels more interesting when there is room for a reader to stop and ask their own questions. A shared interest can give a group a reason to exchange explanations and examples. Seen this way, collaborative learning interests becomes a topic to explore rather than something to sum up too quickly. The part I would like to explore further is what happens when the idea meets a real situation with its own limitations. How can a learning group welcome beginners alongside more experienced participants?
I find planning an academic writing project easier to think about when there is a concrete question to start from. A clear outline can reveal gaps before a writer invests time in full paragraphs. That connection helps me see why academic writing planning can be worth a closer look. I would probably come back to this question after trying to work through one concrete example rather than deciding immediately. How do you decide whether a section supports the main question or merely adds background?
There is something approachable about discussing turning curiosity into deeper understanding through situations people can actually picture. A good follow-up question can turn a quick fact into something worth exploring. It also gives the phrase curiosity and knowledge a clearer meaning than a label on its own. I am still thinking through the details, and a small example would help me picture how this works in practice. How do you decide which question to investigate after an initial explanation?
The topic of learning from the environment around Przywidz gives me a few things to think about, especially when the discussion moves beyond general advice. A familiar outdoor setting can offer new questions when learners observe it at a different time. It makes me curious about the practical side of Przywidz environmental education. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. How could a class compare seasonal observations without needing complicated equipment?
Considering connecting vocational skills with local needs, I keep coming back to the difference between knowing about an idea and putting it into practice. A local practical problem can give a skills lesson a clear purpose. I would keep that thought nearby when looking for ideas about Linia vocational learning. The part I would like to explore further is what happens when the idea meets a real situation with its own limitations. How do you choose a project that is useful without becoming too large for the class?